Kayla beneath the sign of the rhinoceros |
Seeing a reproduction of a period map of local buildings |
Still there were a few jarring things which she and I discussed, now that she is educated, mature, and all that. First, there was the issue of women both in Colonial era history and today. Needless to say, when the Virginians were discussing the "rights of man," they did indeed mean, "man." There is a good number of women among the re-enactors, but of course as in the period times, few of the main artisans are female. Fine, you'll say, that's reasonably historically accurate. But they go so far as to dress female musicians performing at the evening Palace concert in mens' garb and explicitly explain that this is because historically the instruments they choose to play were considered inappropriate for women. All right, still not so uncomfortable, just a bit odd to our eyes and sensibilities; it's not as though they refuse today to allow women to play in the ensemble just because they wouldn't have then.
Oh, but in addition, there's the joke. The little aside scripted in so many programs, and it is definitely scripted and not just the individual actors' choice. The little joke about how we must apologize for discussing these serious political and economic concerns when women are present, for such things are not for delicate ears. The little joke that gets a laugh.
Then there's the question of race and with it comes sadly and inevitably the issue of slavery. The archeologists confirmed multiple times during their presentation that all the tax and census records of the period show that the overall population of the region at the time before and during the Revolutionary War was split almost perfectly 50/50 between European and African Americans. Within "African Americans" they are including slaves, freed slaves, and free born individuals. To their credit, the foundation does seem to have hired a few African Americans among their re-enactors and artisans, for which I applaud them and which I don't remember ever seeing during past visits. And yet, while the entire staff at the Visitors' Center was white, the entire kitchen staff at the hotel was African American. And while I know there are periods in the calendar when the foundation tries to focus on slavery studies and portray the horrors of slavery in some ways that only makes it worse.
By this, I mean that you simply can't convey the true horrors of slavery in a family interactive venue. You can not re-create a slave auction. You can't allow re-enactors to be available to explain the true horrors of whippings, rape, having children sold off, beatings, and being treated like possessions. And worse yet, if instead you clean it up and have people answer or portray the realities of slavery as if the worst slaves had to deal with was simply not having general control over their own lives, or being taken from their original homes and forced to work whether they like it or not, you degrade and minimize the true depth of evil that was American slavery. You can't show it at its everyday worst, and by showing it as only moderately bad you erase the pervasive evil.
We love Colonial Williamsburg; its mission, its activities, its presentation. We appreciate that we have such a great venue so close to us that we can visit every few years. We particularly have always believed that a full understanding of American history from pre-Colonial days through at least the Civil War is critical to modern thought and under-emphasized in the schools, and so we've made a point in our household of teaching it as much as possible. But there are these deficits in modern American thinking and society which are still holdovers from the era.
On our way home, somehow the topic of Affirmative Action came up as Kayla and I talked. It turned out that while she was taught about the existence of government support for the program, she was never taught any context for why it was enacted much less why it is still in place today. No one had ever pointed out that even in our suburban, overwhelmingly middle-class schools, test scores, college attendance, school grades, and outcomes still show a bias for white students over African Americans and Hispanics. They never educated these kids about the dangers of ghettoization, the lack of educational support that comes with poverty or with poor education in previous generations. They never mentioned the schools in the southern parts of the US today where there are still racially divided proms. They simply pretend in the schools that there is no more bias; that every teacher in every American school is as receptive to every student as to every other when it comes to subjective grading, extra time, extra effort, accepting late work, and so on.
We can barely move forward when we don't even look at ourselves peripherally. I'd love some way to add this dialogue more openly, more publicly, and more regularly in the schools, in American homes, and yes, even at places like Colonial Williamsburg.
3 comments:
Or discipline issues. Students of color are suspended or even expelled in many schools for offenses that would generate a message home or detention for white kids. And there's a county, I forget where, where the kids are being hauled into court for "truancy," and they and/or their parents are being held criminally liable. When sometimes it's nothing more than a matter of not enough money for bus fare, or no clothes that meet the uniform requirements.
And my students talk about this all the time: if a young man is of color, driving, he will get stopped many times more often than the same-aged white guy. One told me that he averaged one stop a week in his neighborhood just for "driving while black."
Yup, it's not "over." Not by a long shot. Not while there is disproportionate sentencing for minor crimes, like possessing one joint. One white kid? Ticket and misdemeanor. Black kid with the same amount of weed? Jail time and a fine he can't pay.
Or discipline issues. Students of color are suspended or even expelled in many schools for offenses that would generate a message home or detention for white kids. And there's a county, I forget where, where the kids are being hauled into court for "truancy," and they and/or their parents are being held criminally liable. When sometimes it's nothing more than a matter of not enough money for bus fare, or no clothes that meet the uniform requirements.
And my students talk about this all the time: if a young man is of color, driving, he will get stopped many times more often than the same-aged white guy. One told me that he averaged one stop a week in his neighborhood just for "driving while black."
Yup, it's not "over." Not by a long shot. Not while there is disproportionate sentencing for minor crimes, like possessing one joint. One white kid? Ticket and misdemeanor. Black kid with the same amount of weed? Jail time and a fine he can't pay.
Exactly, Audrey. We discussed how little things add up. Is the teacher as willing to stay after school with a particular student? To accept late work? And of course so much grading of writing is subjective and there is unconscious bias. Then there are the remaining socio-economic factors related to generations of second-rate educational and professional opportunities. But worse yet, when it comes to grades on standardized testing (where the graders have no idea of the identities of the students), minorities still come out way behind in our "progressive" county, which can only be accounted for if you accept that yes, these students are receiving poorer education from their teachers even if every one of the teachers would go up before a court and swear they were unbiased.
Here in our very neighborhood, there is a situation now in which several African American families have inherited title to land which has been in the families from the time when slavery was abolished in MD and thus the ancestors could legally own land, in prime placement to sell for housing. Except the land is worthless, because the public park service refuses to identify the access road as a true road (despite that they have accepted hundreds of smaller ditches and trails), so that it's not legal to build on these parcels. It should be a no-brainer, but instead it's dragged on through generations because the families can't afford a high-class lawyer to push it through. Even more ironic, it's in the part of our area known for having been a center of Underground Railroad activity.
Post a Comment